USA v. Cedric Antonio Jackson, No. 19-11226 (11th Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 19-11226 Date Filed: 10/04/2019 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-11226 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00214-RAL-MAP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CEDRIC ANTONIO JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (October 4, 2019) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Donna Elm, appointed counsel for Cedric Jackson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our Case: 19-11226 Date Filed: 10/04/2019 Page: 2 of 2 independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jackson’s revocation of supervised release and sentence imposed upon revocation are AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.