USA v. Jarvis Rodrick Thomas, No. 19-10085 (11th Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 19-10085 Date Filed: 09/10/2019 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-10085 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr-00404-EAK-JSS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JARVIS RODRICK THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (September 10, 2019) Before WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR and HULL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 19-10085 Date Filed: 09/10/2019 Page: 2 of 2 Thomas Burns, appointed counsel for Jarvis Thomas in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Thomas’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Further, Thomas’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED AS MOOT. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.