USA v. Korre Mahon Fuller, No. 18-14244 (11th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 18-14244 Date Filed: 04/30/2019 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-14244 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:17-cr-00101-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KORRE MAHON FULLER, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida ________________________ (April 30, 2019) Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 18-14244 Date Filed: 04/30/2019 Page: 2 of 2 Korre Fuller appeals his sentence of 78 months of imprisonment for possessing a firearm as a convicted felon. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2). Fuller challenges the use of his two prior convictions for armed robbery, Fla. Stat. § 812.13(1), to enhance his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines, U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a). We affirm. We review de novo whether a prior conviction constitutes a crime of violence under the Sentencing Guidelines. United States v. Dixon, 874 F.3d 678, 680 (11th Cir. 2017). Fuller concedes that his challenge to the use of his prior convictions to enhance his sentence is foreclosed by binding precedent. We held in United States v. Fritts, 841 F.3d 937, 940 (11th Cir. 2016), that a conviction for armed robbery under section 912.13 of the Florida Statutes categorically qualifies as a violent felony under the elements clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act. And recently the United States Supreme Court reached the same conclusion in Stokeling v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 544 (2019). Precedent that addresses whether an offense is a violent felony under the Act is also dispositive in deciding whether the offense qualified as a crime of violence under the elements clause of the Guidelines. Fritts, 841 F.3d at 940 & n.4. The district court correctly counted Fuller’s prior convictions for armed robbery as predicate offenses under the Guidelines. We AFFIRM Fuller’s sentence. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
