USA v. Louis Huff, No. 17-15798 (11th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 17-15798 Date Filed: 06/14/2018 Page: 1 of 3 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-15798 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:17-cr-14034-JEM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LOUIS HUFF, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________ (June 14, 2018) Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Louis Huff negotiated a plea agreement with the government under which he agreed to plead guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute Case: 17-15798 Date Filed: 06/14/2018 Page: 2 of 3 methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). As part of that deal, Huff broadly agreed to waive his right to appeal his sentence in exchange for the government’s promises to take certain actions at sentencing. The district court accepted Huff’s guilty plea and then sentenced him to 150 months of imprisonment, within the guideline range of 135 to 168 months. Huff now appeals his sentence, arguing that his sentence is unreasonably high. The government has moved to enforce the appeal waiver. We grant the government’s motion. We will enforce an appeal waiver that was made knowingly and voluntarily. United States v. Bascomb, 451 F.3d 1292, 1294 (11th Cir. 2006); United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350–51 (11th Cir. 1993). To prove that a waiver was made knowingly and voluntarily, the government must show that (1) the district court specifically questioned the defendant about the waiver during the plea colloquy; or (2) the record makes clear that the defendant otherwise understood the full significance of the waiver. Bushert, 997 F.2d at 1351. We enforce the waiver in Huff’s plea agreement. First, we find that the waiver was made knowingly and voluntarily. Huff was specifically questioned about the terms of the waiver, including its exceptions, during the plea colloquy, and Huff confirmed that he understood the waiver and had discussed it with his attorney. 2 Case: 17-15798 Date Filed: 06/14/2018 Page: 3 of 3 Second, no exception to the waiver applies. By agreeing to the waiver, Huff waived the right to appeal unless (a) the sentence exceeded the statutory maximum, (b) the sentence exceeded the guideline range, or (c) the government appealed. Because Huff’s sentence did not exceed the statutory maximum or his guideline range and the government has not appealed, the waiver bars this appeal. For these reasons, we GRANT the government’s motion to dismiss Huff’s appeal based on the sentence-appeal waiver in his plea agreement. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
