USA v. Hector Camirlo Espinoza-Guido, No. 17-10878 (11th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 17-10878 Date Filed: 10/31/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-10878 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr-00348-SDM-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus HECTOR CAMIRLO ESPINOZA-GUIDO, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (October 31, 2017) Before MARCUS, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 17-10878 Date Filed: 10/31/2017 Page: 2 of 2 Rosemary Cakmis, appointed counsel for Hector Espinoza-Guido in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Espinoza-Guido’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.