BSL Investments, II, LLC v. Fresh Frozen Foods, Inc., No. 16-14255 (11th Cir. 2017)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 16-14255 Date Filed: 03/01/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-14255 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cv-02136-AT BSL INVESTMENTS, II, LLC, f.k.a. Fresh Frozen Foods, LLC, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FRESH FROZEN FOODS, INC., f.k.a. FFF Acquisition Sub, Inc., Defendant - Appellee. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ________________________ (March 1, 2017) Case: 16-14255 Date Filed: 03/01/2017 Page: 2 of 2 Before WILSON, JORDAN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This is a contract dispute arising from an escrow agreement between BSL Investments and Fresh Frozen Foods. BSL filed a complaint in district court seeking a declaratory judgment that, among other things, Fresh Frozen Foods is not entitled to escrow funds governed by the agreement. The district court granted summary judgment to Fresh Frozen Foods. The court found that Fresh Frozen Foods requested access to the escrow funds as indemnification for damages it suffered from dealings with BSL; BSL failed to timely dispute the request; and under the plain language of the escrow agreement, BSL’s failure waived BSL’s right to contest the request. BSL appeals the district court’s summary judgment decision. After careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm substantially for reasons set forth in the district court’s thorough opinion. See BSL Investments, II, LLC v. Fresh Frozen Foods, Inc., No. 1:15-cv-02136 (N.D. Ga. June 16, 2016). AFFIRMED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
