In re: Larry Leonard, No. 16-13528 (11th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 1 of 30 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-13528-J, 16-13804-J, & 16-13857-J ________________________ IN RE: LARRY LEONARD, Petitioner. __________________________ Application for Leave to File a Second or Successive Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h) _________________________ Before: MARCUS, MARTIN, and JORDAN, Circuit Judges B Y T H E P A N E L: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255(h) and 2244(b)(3)(A), Larry Leonard has filed an application seeking an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Such authorization may be granted only if this Court certifies that the second or successive motion contains a claim involving: (1) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense; or (2) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable. 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). “The court of appeals may authorize the filing of a second or successive application only if it determines that the application makes a prima facie showing that the Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 2 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 3 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 4 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 5 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 6 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 7 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 8 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 9 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 10 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 11 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 12 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 13 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 14 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 15 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 16 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 17 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 18 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 19 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 20 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 21 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 22 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 23 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 24 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 25 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 26 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 27 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 28 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 29 of 30 Case: 16-13528 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 30 of 30

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.