USA v. Michael Robert Erskine, No. 16-11665 (11th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 16-11665 Date Filed: 02/27/2018 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-11665 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket Nos. 1:14-cr-00274-KD-C-1, 1:15-cr-00079-KD-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MICHAEL ROBERT ERSKINE, Defendant - Appellant ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama ________________________ (February 27, 2018) Before WILSON, MARTIN and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 16-11665 Date Filed: 02/27/2018 Page: 2 of 2 Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Michael Erskine in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Erskine and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Erskine’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.