Stephen Musilino, et al. v. Alabama Marble Co., Inc., et al., No. 15-13733 (11th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 15-13733 Date Filed: 01/19/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 15-13733 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket Nos. 1:15-cv-00053-RDP; 14-bkc-40157-JJR11 In re: ALABAMA MARBLE CO., INC., Debtor. __________________________________________________________________ STEPHEN MUSILINO, SYCAMORE MARBLE COMPANY, INC., MEDITERRANEAN EXPORTS, INC., Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus ALABAMA MARBLE CO., INC., BLUE DEVIL INVESTMENTS, INC., DAVID LUCE, CREDIT STRATEGY ADVISORS, INC., TBGS QUARRY, LLC, Defendants - Appellees. Case: 15-13733 Date Filed: 01/19/2016 Page: 2 of 2 ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama ________________________ (January 19, 2016) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: After an independent review of the record, we affirm the District Court’s July 20, 2015, order denying Appellants’ appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Alabama. Appellants challenge a settlement agreement approved by the Bankruptcy Court, asking that this Court effectively undo all or part of that agreement. As the District Court properly held, the appellants’ claims must be denied on equitable mootness grounds. See Musilino v. Ala. Marble Co. Inc., 534 B.R. 820 (N.D. Ala. 2015). As such, we affirm the District Court’s judgment. AFFIRMED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
