USA v. Karriece Quontrel Davis, No. 15-13504 (11th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on April 19, 2016.
Download PDF
Case: 16-17492 Date Filed: 02/05/2018 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-17492 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 5:08-cr-00005-MW-GRJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KARRIECE QUONTREL DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida ________________________ (February 5, 2018) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON, and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 16-17492 Date Filed: 02/05/2018 Page: 2 of 2 Karriece Davis, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for credit for time served and denial of his motion for reconsideration. Davis’s notice of appeal in this case states that he wishes to appeal the order denying his motion for reconsideration, but his appellate brief in this case discusses the district court’s denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion for relief from judgment from which Davis has filed a separate notice of appeal. An appellant’s brief must contain a statement of all of the issues presented for review. Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(5). We liberally construe pro se pleadings. Tannenbaum v. United States, 148 F.3d 1262, 1263 (11th Cir. 1998) (per curiam). A pro se appellant nonetheless still abandons an issue when he fails to offer argument on the issue in his brief. Timson v. Sampson, 518 F.3d 870, 874 (11th Cir. 2008) (per curiam). Davis has not raised any argument in his brief challenging the district court’s denials of his motion for credit for time served and his motion for reconsideration. He thus has abandoned any challenge to those denials. See id. Accordingly, we must affirm because Davis has not shown that the district court erred by denying his motion for credit for time served or his motion for reconsideration. AFFIRMED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
