USA v. Mohammed Bah, No. 15-13271 (11th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 15-13271 Date Filed: 08/29/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 15-13271 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00098-RWS-RGV-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MOHAMMED BAH, a.k.a. Little, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ________________________ (August 29, 2016) Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15-13271 Date Filed: 08/29/2016 Page: 2 of 2 Michael J. Trost, appointed counsel for Mohammed Bah in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bah’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Bah’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED AS MOOT. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.