Amy Rachel v. Christopher McCann, et al, No. 15-12677 (11th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 15-12677 Date Filed: 02/04/2016 Page: 1 of 3 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 15-12677 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cv-00522-WS-M AMY RACHEL, as administratrix of the estate of Gregory Rachel, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHRISTOPHER MCCANN, JOHN JACKSON, Defendants-Appellants. ________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama ________________________ (February 4, 2016) Before WILSON, JORDAN, and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15-12677 Date Filed: 02/04/2016 Page: 2 of 3 Officers Christopher McCann and John Jackson appeal the district court’s denial of their motions for summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity in an action brought by plaintiff-appellee Amy Rachel (Plaintiff), the administratrix of the estate of Gregory Rachel (Rachel), who died in police custody. In her complaint, Plaintiff averred McCann and Jackson used excessive force to effect Rachel’s arrest, were deliberately indifferent to Rachel’s serious medical need, and were liable under state law for his wrongful death. In support of her claims and in response to McCann’s and Jackson’s summary judgment motions, Plaintiff proffered evidence that McCann and Jackson repeatedly kicked and beat Rachel while he lay prone and non-resisting on the ground. She also presented evidence that they subsequently failed to summon a medical unit for assistance, instead kneeling and sitting on Rachel, hog-tying him, and keeping him on his stomach with his stomach bowed towards the ground, without regard for his breathing, pulse, or consciousness. And, after witnessing Rachel “seize” and fall unconscious, they made no effort to transport him to an emergency room, summon medical assistance, or check his breathing or pulse. After reviewing the evidence and drawing all reasonable inferences therefrom in favor of Plaintiff, as we must at this stage in the proceedings, we substantially agree with the district court’s findings of fact and holdings of law. 2 Case: 15-12677 Date Filed: 02/04/2016 Page: 3 of 3 Accordingly, McCann and Jackson are not entitled to qualified immunity, and the district court properly denied their motions for summary judgment. Thus, the order of the district court is AFFIRMED. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
