Jack T. Krauser, D.M.D. v. Biohorizons, Inc., et al., No. 13-11123 (11th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 13-11123 Date Filed: 11/17/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 13-11123 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 9:10-cv-80454-KAM JACK T. KRAUSER, D.M.D., an Individual, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BIOHORIZONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, BIOLOK INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation, BIOHORIZONS IMPLANT SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants - Appellees. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________ (November 17, 2015) Case: 13-11123 Date Filed: 11/17/2015 Page: 2 of 2 Before MARCUS, JILL PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Dr. Jack Krauser appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of BioHorizons, Inc., BioLok International, Inc., and BioHorizons Implant Systems, Inc. (collectively, “BioHorizons”) in his lawsuit seeking a declaration that he was the owner of the subject matter set forth in a variety of BioHorizons’s patents and associated federal registrations regarding dental implant systems. On appeal, Dr. Krauser argues based on an October 1996 agreement that the district court erred in concluding that he had no contractual claim to ownership in the dental implant systems. Upon a thorough review of the briefs and record, and with the benefit of oral argument, we find no error and affirm based on the well-reasoned summary judgment opinion and order of the district court, entered on October 1, 2012. AFFIRMED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
