Stoufflet v. United States, No. 13-10874 (11th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CasePetitioner pleaded guilty to charges related to his conspiracy with others to establish an online pharmacy in violation of federal law. At issue on appeal was whether petitioner could collaterally attack the voluntariness of his guilty plea in a motion to vacate his sentence, 28 U.S.C. 2255, after he already presented that issue as an objection to his appointed counsel's motion to withdraw in his direct appeal. The court concluded that the prisoner was procedurally barred from relitigating the voluntariness of his plea and affirmed the denial of petitioner's motion to vacate his sentence.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.