USA v. Roderick Monroe, No. 13-10460 (11th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 13-10460 Date Filed: 08/29/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 13-10460 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00100-GKS-TBS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RODERICK MONROE, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (August 29, 2013) Before CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT and BARKETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Charles E. Taylor, appointed counsel for Roderick Monroe in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant Case: 13-10460 Date Filed: 08/29/2013 Page: 2 of 2 and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Monroe s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.