USA v. Richard James Bassett, Jr., No. 12-16173 (11th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 12-16173 Date Filed: 05/17/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 12-16173 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 6:01-cr-00006-JA-GJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee versus RICHARD JAMES BASSETT, JR., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (May 17, 2013) Before HULL, PRYOR and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Richard Bassett Jr. appeals the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence based on Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The Case: 12-16173 Date Filed: 05/17/2013 Page: 2 of 2 United States moves for a summary affirmance and to stay the briefing schedule. Because the position [of the United States] . . . is clearly right as a matter of law so that there [is] no substantial question as to the outcome of the case, Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), we grant the motion for summary affirmance and dismiss as moot the motion to stay the briefing schedule. Bassett s arguments are foreclosed by our precedent. We have held that defendants, like Bassett, whose sentences are based on the career offender guideline, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, not on the drug quantity tables, id. § 2D1.1, are ineligible for a reduction of their sentence under Amendment 750. United States v. Lawson, 686 F.3d 1317, 1321 (11th Cir. 2012); United States v. Moore, 541 F.3d 1323, 1327 30 (11th Cir. 2008). Bassett argues that the district court should have considered the statutory sentencing factors, 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), but a district court considers those sentencing factors only when it has the authority to reduce a sentence and decides whether to grant a reduction. The district court lacked the authority to reduce Barrett s sentence. We AFFIRM the denial of Bassett s motion to reduce his sentence, and we DISMISS as moot the motion to stay the briefing schedule. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
