Indyne, Inc. v. Abacus Technology Corporation, et al., No. 12-13345 (11th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 12-13345 Date Filed: 03/20/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 12-13345 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cv-00137-ACC-DAB INDYNE, INC., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ABACUS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, JERRY RENINGER, MATTHEW BOYLAN, Defendants - Appellees. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (March 20, 2013) Before CARNES, HULL, and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: InDyne, Inc. appeals the district court s grant of summary judgment in favor of Abacus Technology Corporation, Jerry Reninger, and Matthew Boylan on the Case: 12-13345 Date Filed: 03/20/2013 Page: 2 of 2 copyright infringement claim brought by InDyne. InDyne contends that the district court erred when it concluded that InDyne failed to present sufficient evidence of the copyrighted material. Having carefully considered the record and the parties briefs and having heard oral argument, we AFFIRM on the basis of the thorough and well-reasoned opinion of the district court, InDyne, Inc. v. Abacus Tech. Corp., 876 F. Supp. 2d 1278 (M.D. Fla. 2012). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.