United States v. Reeves, et al., No. 12-13110 (11th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseDefendants appealed their convictions for conspiracy to distribute. The court concluded that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conspiracy convictions; the court rejected Defendant Halcomb-Reeves' evidentiary challenges; and there was no discernible error in the prosecutor's closing argument and, if there was error, it was harmless because the record contained sufficient independent evidence of Defendant Moss's guilt. Finally, the district court did not err by attributing at least 150 kilograms of cocaine to Defendant Reeves at sentencing. Accordingly, the court affirmed the convictions and sentences. The court remanded for the limited purpose of correcting the scrivener's errors in Defendant Reeve's written judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.