United States v. Mathauda, No. 11-13558 (11th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseDefendant was convicted of offenses stemming from his involvement in an operation of a series of companies that marketed and sold fraudulent business opportunities. Defendant raise several issues on appeal. The court concluded that the district court erred in adding a two-level sentencing enhancement for defendant's alleged violation of a prior court order where defendant received the enhancement because he violated an order he never actually received from a case his attorney presumably should have handled. The court reversed and remanded for resentencing. The court affirmed as to all other issues raised on appeal.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.