USA v. Julio Meza-Sanchez, No. 10-15953 (11th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-15953 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 11, 2011 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY ________________________ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cr-00303-SDM-MAP-5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JULIO MEZA-SANCHEZ Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (July 11, 2011) Before BARKETT, MARTIN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Ryan Thomas Truskoski, appointed counsel for Julio Meza-Sanchez in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Meza-Sanchez s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. However, because of several scrivener s errors on the criminal judgment, we REMAND solely for the purpose of correcting the judgment to reflect Meza-Sanchez s conviction and sentence under 46 U.S.C. §§ 70503(a)(1), 70506(a) & (b), and 21 U.S.C. § 960(b)(1)(B)(ii), not 46 U.S.C. §§ 708506(a), 70605(b) and 18 U.S.C. §§ 960(b)(1)(B)(ii). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.