Bishop v. Warden, GDCP, No. 10-15442 (11th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CasePetitioner, convicted of malice murder and armed robbery, appealed the district court's denial of habeas relief. Petitioner raised claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and a violation of Brady v. Maryland. The court concluded that, in light of the evidence as a whole, the state court's determination, that petitioner was not prejudiced by ineffective assistance of counsel, was not objectively unreasonable. The court also concluded that petitioner's Brady claim was procedurally defaulted and petitioner failed to overcome the procedural default by showing cause and prejudice, or a fundamental miscarriage of justice. Accordingly, the court affirmed the denial of habeas relief.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.