USA v. Shelton Purdue, No. 08-16006 (11th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 08-16006 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT APRIL 29, 2009 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D. C. Docket No. 03-00150-CR-3-RV UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SHELTON PURDUE, a.k.a. Shelton M. Perdue, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _________________________ (April 29, 2009) Before BIRCH, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Randolph Murrell, appointed counsel for Shelton Purdue, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the decision of the district court is AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.