USA v. Minnie Pearl Thomas, No. 08-12004 (11th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 08-12004 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT NOVEMBER 10, 2010 JOHN LEY CLERK D. C. Docket No. 99-00045-CR-HL-5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MINNIE PEARL THOMAS, a.k.a. Nick, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _________________________ (November 10, 2010) Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Minnie Pearl Thomas, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court s denial of her motion for a reduction of sentence. Thomas was convicted for one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and one count of distribution of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court sentenced Pearl to two mandatory life sentences as a career-offender. She sought a reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 706, which provides a two-level reduction in the base offense levels applicable to crack cocaine offenses. After review, we affirm Thomas sentence.1 Sentences based on career-offender status or on a statutory minimum are not based on a range that has subsequently been lowered within the meaning of § 3582(c)(2), and district courts are not authorized to reduce a sentence under that statute. See United States v. Williams, 549 F.3d 1337, 1339 (11th Cir. 2008); United States v. Moore, 541 F.3d 1323, 1327-28 (11th Cir. 2008). Thomas concedes she was sentenced as a career offender, and her prior convictions for drug offenses resulted in mandatory minimum life sentences. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(A), 851. Consequently, any adjustment to her advisory guideline range 1 We review de novo a district court s conclusions about the scope of its legal authority under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). United States v. Moore, 541 F.3d 1323, 1326 (11th Cir. 2008). 2 would not affect the length of her prison terms and she is ineligible for a sentence reduction. AFFIRMED. 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.