USA v. Williamson Dimanche, No. 07-15754 (11th Cir. 2008)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 07-15754 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT November 5, 2008 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D. C. Docket No. 07-00118-CR-T-24-MSS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIAMSON DIMANCHE, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (November 5, 2008) Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and MARCUS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Ray Lopez, counsel for Williamson Dimanche, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Dimanche has filed a document that we have construed as a motion for an extension of time to file a supplemental reply to the Anders motion. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Dimanche was able to file a response to counsel s brief raising several issues of alleged arguable merit. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dimanche s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Because Dimanche had opportunity to file an extensive response to counsel s motion, his motion for an extension of time to file a supplemental reply is DENIED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
