USA v. Vincent Mead, No. 06-11685 (11th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 06-11685 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DECEMBER 28, 2006 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D. C. Docket No. 04-00373-CR-J-20HTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus VINCENT MEAD, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (December 28, 2006) Before TJOFLAT, HULL and COX, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: James H. Burke, Jr., appointed counsel for Vincent Mead in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Mead s supervised release and the resulting 60month sentence is AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.