Sandy Altrichter v. Inamed Corporation, No. 05-11993 (11th Cir. 2006)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 05-11993 ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT February 2, 2006 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D. C. Docket No. 97-11441-CV-S SANDY ALTRICHTER, JANELL CRUMLEY BLACK, DARLENE DAVIS, LOIS HAZMILTON, ROSE MARIE HODGES, GLORIA JONES, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, versus INAMED CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, MCGHAN MEDICAL CORP., CUI CORPORATION, DONALD MCGHAN, Defendants. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _________________________ (February 2, 2006) Before BLACK, HULL and FARRIS *, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: After review and oral argument, this Court concludes that the Appellant has not shown reversible error in the narrow result reached in the district court s order of 22 August 2003, as substantially limited, in effect, by its order of 16 March 2005. Because the district court s orders, read together, limit the purpose for which the information in the documents at issue may be used at this time and permit plaintiffs to petition the district court further as the need arises, we need not at this time address the full scope of the Settlement Class Counsel s access rights or whether Settlement Class Counsel would be entitled to documents for other purposes. AFFIRMED. * Honorable Jerome Farris, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
