Eileen Hamall-Desai v. Fortis Benefits Ins. Co., No. 05-11869 (11th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 05-11869 ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT February 2, 2006 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D. C. Docket No. 03-01529-CV-BBM-1 EILEEN HAMALL-DESAI, Plaintiff-AppelleeCross-Appellant, versus FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCross-Appellee. ________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _________________________ (February 2, 2006) Before BLACK, HULL and FARRIS*, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Honorable Jerome Farris, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation. AFFIRMED. See 11th Cir. R. 36-1.1 1 11th Cir. R. 36-1 provides: W hen the court determines that any of the following circum stances exist: (a) judgm ent of the district court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; (b) the evidence in support of a jury verdict is sufficient; (c) the order of an adm inistrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole; (d) summ ary judgment, directed verdict, or judgm ent on the pleadings is supported by the record; (e) judgm ent has been entered w ithout a reversible error of law; and an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgm ent or order may be affirm ed or enforced without opinion. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.