USA v. Michael Headrick, No. 05-10421 (11th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

(DO NOT PUBLISH) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 05-10421 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT January 4, 2006 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D.C. Docket No. 04-00020-CR-6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL HEADRICK, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _________________________ (January 4, 2006) Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Julian B. Smith, Jr., appointed counsel for Michael Headrick in this direct criminal appeal, filed a renewed motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We denied counsel s renewed motion without prejudice and ordered him to provide a transcript of the Rule 11 change-of-plea hearing. Counsel has now supplemented the record on appea with the requested transcript, and we construe this filing as a resubmission of his renewed motion to withdraw and Anders brief. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Headrick s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.