United States v. Walker, No. 20-1304 (10th Cir. 2021)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT _________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, July 6, 2021 Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL WALKER, JR., No. 20-1304 (D.C. No. 1:06-CR-00320-LTB-2) (D. Colo.) Defendant - Appellant. _________________________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT * _________________________________ Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. _________________________________ This matter is before the court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Remand First Claim for Relief. At the court’s direction, the parties supplemented the joint motion with additional information. The motion as supplemented asks this court to remand the first claim for relief the appellant presented to the district court in his motion for sentencing relief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) in light of this court’s recent decisions in United States v. McGee, 992 F.3d 1035 (10th Cir. 2021), and After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. * United States v. Maumau, 993 F.3d 821 (10th Cir. 2021). The appellant also states that he is withdrawing the second claim for relief he presented to the district court in his § 3582(c) motion. Upon consideration, the joint motion as supplemented is granted. The appellant’s second claim is withdrawn. This matter is remanded to the district court with instructions to vacate its order of August 21, 2020, as to the appellant’s first claim for relief, and to conduct any and all proceedings necessary to consider the parties’ arguments anew in light of McGee and Maumau. The clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith. Entered for the Court Per Curiam 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
