United States v. Dodson, No. 19-3098 (10th Cir. 2019)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT _________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, August 14, 2019 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court Plaintiff - Appellee, v. No. 19-3098 (D.C. No. 2:18-CR-20048-DDC-1) (D. Kan.) ALLEN DODSON, Defendant - Appellant. _________________________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT* _________________________________ Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. _________________________________ This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This matter comes on for consideration of the parties’ Joint Motion for Summary Disposition. Upon consideration thereof, the motion is granted and the district court’s judgment is affirmed. The defendant was convicted, following the entry of a conditional guilty plea, of failure to register as a sex offender, in violation of the Sex Offender Registration * This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. and Notification Act (“SORNA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2250. He was sentenced to 10 months’ incarceration plus five years of supervised release. On appeal, the only argument the defendant presents is that application of SORNA to him, a pre-act offender, violates the nondelegation doctrine. This court has rejected that argument in United States v. Nichols, 775 F.3d 1225, 1230-31 (10th Cir. 2014), rev’d on other grounds sub nom. Nichols v. United States, 136 S.Ct. 1113 (2016). See also Gundy v. United States, 139 S.Ct. 2116 (2019). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith. Entered for the Court Per Curiam 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.