United States v. Springer, No. 18-5104 (10th Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT _________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, June 28, 2019 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LINDSEY KENT SPRINGER, No. 18-5104 (D.C. Nos. 4:13-CV-00145-SPF-TLW and 4:09-CR-00043-SPF-1) (N.D. Okla.) Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________ ORDER _________________________________ Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and McKAY, Circuit Judges. _________________________________ This matter is before the court on our order (May 14, 2019) denying Mr. Springer’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. There we ordered Mr. Springer to pay his $505.00 filing fees by June 4, 2019, and warned that failure to timely comply could result in the dismissal of his appeal without further notice. 1 Though the deadline passed more than three weeks ago, Mr. Springer has still not paid the filing fees. He has instead filed numerous motions. For example, he has moved to vacate the order requiring payment, arguing that the Court Clerk 1 In denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we noted that Mr. Springer had certified possession of $1,300 in a Bureau of Prisons trust fund. displaced the panel’s Article III authority by signing and issuing our order. Mr. Springer is mistaken; the order was decided by the panel and filed by the Court Clerk at the panel’s direction. We thus deny this motion. Mr. Springer has also moved for the appointment of counsel, to expand the certificate of appealability, to reconsider the applicability of his filing restrictions to this appeal, and for determination of the status of the Court Clerk, the deputy court clerks, and the government’s attorney under the Constitution’s Appointments Clause. But Mr. Springer has not paid the filing fees, so he has not properly begun this appeal. All of Mr. Springer’s motions presuppose that he has properly begun his appeal, and he hasn’t. Because Mr. Springer never paid the filing fees, we deny these motions. * * * We dismiss the appeal and deny all pending motions. Mr. Springer is reminded that he remains obligated to pay the filing fees. Entered for the Court Robert E. Bacharach Circuit Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.