McCloskey v. WY Attorney General, No. 17-8056 (10th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit February 5, 2018 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court RICHARD McCLOSKEY, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL, No. 17-8056 (D.C. No. 1:17-CV-00045-SWS) (D. Wyo.) Respondent - Appellee. ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY * Before PHILLIPS, McKAY, and McHUGH, Circuit Judges. Petitioner Richard McCloskey seeks a certificate of appealability to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his § 2254 habeas corpus petition. In his habeas petition, Petitioner sought review of various state criminal proceedings against him. These proceedings were either recently decided cases that Petitioner had not appealed in the Wyoming state courts, or ongoing criminal cases in which a final judgment had not yet been entered. The district court thus concluded that the federal habeas petition must be dismissed without prejudice * This order is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. based on (1) Petitioner’s failure to exhaust his state court remedies, see 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A); see also Allen v. Zavaras, 568 F.3d 1197, 1202 (10th Cir. 2009) (dismissal of a habeas petition is proper if the failure to exhaust is clear from the face of the petition), and (2) the Younger abstention doctrine, see Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). After thoroughly reviewing Petitioner’s brief and the record on appeal, we conclude that reasonable jurists would not debate the correctness of the district court’s procedural ruling. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 478 (2000). We therefore DENY Petitioner’s request for a certificate of appealability and DISMISS the appeal. Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is GRANTED. Entered for the Court Monroe G. McKay Circuit Judge -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.