McKay v. Hayes, No. 14-7033 (10th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit August 28, 2014 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court RONALD MERL McKAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, and TWIN RIVERS LAND & CATTLE COMPANY, LP, a New Mexico limited partnership; TWIN RIVERS LAND & CATTLE CO., LP, LLC, a New Mexico limited liability company as general partner of Twin Rivers Land & Cattle Company, LP, No. 14-7033 (D.C. No. 6:13-CV-00176-RAW) (E.D. Okla.) Plaintiffs, v. A.V. HAYES, JR., Defendant - Appellee. ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before GORSUCH, MURPHY, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges. * This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. After a real estate deal went awry, Ronald Merl McKay sued Acie Hayes, Jr. Mr. Hayes moved for summary judgment, but Mr. McKay never responded even after the district court extended his deadline and warned him that, if he didn t respond, the district court would dismiss the case or deem the motion confessed. The district court, under a local rule, deemed the motion confessed and dismissed the action with prejudice. On appeal, Mr. McKay reargues the merits of his case but he does not directly address the district court s ruling, let alone identify any defect in it. While this court takes seriously its obligation to construe liberally pro se filings like Mr. McKay s, it will not invent arguments for reversal that a litigant does not even touch upon: the court cannot take on the responsibility of serving as the litigant s attorney in constructing arguments and searching the record. Garrett v. Selby Connor Maddux & Janer, 425 F.3d 836, 840 (10th Cir. 2005). The judgment is affirmed. ENTERED FOR THE COURT Neil M. Gorsuch Circuit Judge -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.