United States v. Naramor, No. 12-7053 (10th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this Case
Defendant Robbie Naramor pled guilty to mailing a threatening communication to a state judge. With no plea agreement to consider, the district court varied upward from the sentencing range calculated under the United States Sentencing Guidelines and sentenced Defendant to 60 months’ imprisonment, the statutory maximum. Defendant appealed the sentence, arguing: (1) that the district court erred in using a prior state conviction to calculate his criminal-history category; (2) the court erred in permitting the government to withdraw a motion to award Defendant a reduction to his offense level for acceptance of responsibility; (3) his sentence was procedurally unreasonable; and (4) the sentence was substantively unreasonable. Finding no error, the Tenth Circuit affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.