Murray v. Rudek, No. 11-6125 (10th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this Case
Pro se prisoner Petitioner Donnott Murray sought a certificate of appealability (COA) from the Tenth Circuit to appeal a district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition. After an Oklahoma state jury trial, Petitioner was convicted of trafficking illegal drugs and sentenced to twenty-five years' imprisonment and an $80,000 fine. On appeal, Petitioner argued that the traffic stop preceding his arrest violated his Fourth Amendment rights and that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by not raising a Fourth Amendment challenge to the stop. Upon review of Petitioner's application for a COA and his appellate brief, the Tenth Circuit found that the district court's resolution of Petitioner's claims was not reasonably subject to debate and that his claims were not adequate to deserve further proceedings. The Court denied Petitioner's request for a COA and dismissed his appeal.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.