Winfrey v. Rudek, No. 11-5070 (10th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this Case
Pro se prisoner Dwayne Winfrey sought a certificate of appealability from the Tenth Circuit to appeal a district court's order that denied him the writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner was convicted by a jury on drug trafficking charges and sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment. He was unsuccessful in his state post-conviction proceedings. Petitioner raised multiple issues on appeal. Principal among them was Petitioner's contention that the evidence presented against him at trial was insufficient to support the jury's verdict. Upon review of the record and the applicable legal authority, the Tenth Circuit found "[i]n cogent orders the district court thoroughly and correctly addressed and resolved the issues raised by [Petitioner]. As no jurist of reason could reasonably debate the correctness of the district court's decisions," the Court denied Petitioner's request for a COA and dismissed his appeal.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.