United States v. Pena-Valencia, No. 11-4136 (10th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this Case
Defendant Oscar Aureliano Pena-Valencia sought a certificate of appealability (COA) to challenge a district court's dismissal of his motion for post-conviction relief. Defendant entered into an agreement with the government and pled guilty to reentry as a previously removed alien. As part of the plea agreement, he waived his right to raise a collateral attack on his sentence except on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel. The district court sentenced him to 46 months’ imprisonment. He appealed his sentence but the Tenth Circuit dismissed the appeal as untimely. Defendant filed his motion for post-conviction relief in district court, claiming that he was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed to conduct a thorough examination into the facts of the case, to interrogate witnesses, to move to suppress evidence, and to apprise him of his "substantial rights and potential defenses" in addition to failing to challenge the Presentence Report and other matters that were ultimately used in calculating his sentence. Upon review, the Tenth Circuit found that "no reasonable jurist could dispute" the district court's determination that Defendant did not adequately allege an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, and that his other claims were barred by the waiver in his plea agreement. Accordingly, the Court denied Defendant's application for a COA and dismissed his appeal.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.