United States v. Simpson-El, No. 11-3059 (10th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this CasePlaintiff-Appellee Kapelle Simpson-El appealed the district court's denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. His petition was based upon the alleged ineffectiveness of his trial counsel, arguing that his counsel misadvised him to abandon a plea agreement. Plaintiff was indicted for stealing cars, transporting them across state lines, changing the VINs, and selling the cars or the parts on the Internet. The government offered Plaintiff a plea deal, but Plaintiff felt the government based its case on bad evidence against him, and that trial would establish his innocence. The district court concluded that Plaintiff did not make a "substantial showing of the denial" of his constitutional rights. "Because [the district court's] decision is not even debatably incorrect," the Tenth Circuit denied Plaintiff's request for a Certificate of Appealability, effectively dismissing his motion.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.