Cordova v. Janecka, No. 11-2171 (10th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this Case
Petitioner David Cordova sought a certificate of appealability (COA) to challenge a district court's dismissal of his petition for habeas relief. A state jury convicted Petitioner of residential burglary and larceny over $2500, and the trial judge sentenced him to fourteen years in prison. Petitioner appealed his conviction, lost, and then filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus in state court raising claims of prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective assistance of counsel. On appeal to the Tenth Circuit, Petitioner raised three claims: (1) prosecutorial misconduct prejudiced his trial; (2) the evidence was insufficient to prove him guilty of the charges against him; and (3) he received ineffective assistance of counsel. The district court adopted the magistrate judge's findings, dismissed Petitioner's claims and denied a COA. The Tenth Circuit adopted the magistrate's findings that Petitioner failed to offer sufficient evidence to support his claims. As such, the Court denied Petitioner's request for a COA and dismissed his appeal.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.