United States v. Chacon, No. 11-2137 (10th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this CasePro se prisoner Defendant-Appellant Cesar Chacon sought a certificate of appealability (COA) to challenge a district court's decision to dismiss his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for lack of jurisdiction. The court construed the motion as an unauthorized second or successive motion for post-conviction relief. In May 2008, Defendant pled guilty, without a plea agreement, to one count of conspiracy and one count of possession with the intent to distribute more than fifty kilograms of marijuana. He was sentenced to 151 and 60 months of imprisonment respectively, with the sentences to run concurrently. The Tenth Circuit dismissed his direct appeal as lacking a meritorious appellate issue. Subsequently, Defendant filed a section 2255 motion, asserting that his counsel provided ineffective assistance by: (1) failing to challenge the conspiracy charge; (2) failing to recommend sentencing leniency; (3) failing to pursue a two-point reduction pursuant to sentencing guideline § 3B1.2(b) for minor participation; (4) failing to show Defendant his presentence report; and (5) failing to challenge his career offender status. The motion was ultimately denied, and Defendant filed a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion re-asserting claim (4) concerning his role as a minor participant. The court again denied relief, and Defendant applied for a COA from the Tenth Circuit. Upon review, the Tenth Circuit concluded the district court properly dismissed Defendant's Rule 60(b) motion and denied his request for a COA.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.