Cardenas v. Hartley, No. 11-1301 (10th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this Case
Pro se prisoner Petitioner-Appellant Alexander Cardenas sought a certificate of appealability (COA) to challenge a district court's judgement that denied his habeas application. In his application, he challenged the admission of statements made after a Miranda warning as a violation of his Fifth Amendment right. In 1997, Petitioner called police to report that he had killed his long-time friend in an altercation after a night of alcohol and drug use. Before his confession at the scene, police read Petitioner his Miranda rights. After this, Petitioner made additional statements to the police at the police station. Petitioner contended that the trial court erred in finding his statements to the police were voluntary and that he waived his Miranda rights. Upon review, the Tenth Circuit concluded that Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the district court's resolution of his constitutional claim was reasonably debatable. As such, the Court denied Petitioner's request for a COA and dismissed his appeal.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.