United States v. Reeves, No. 11-1200 (10th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this CaseDefendant-Appellant Timothy Reeves challenged the district court's revocation of his supervised release and modification of the terms of his pending supervised release based on vindictive prosecution and failure to rule on his objectives. Defendant was convicted in 1994 of mailing a threatening communication based upon sexual demands made in a letter to a woman he did not know in violation of federal law. He served eighteen months for that conviction, consecutive to sentences for other state crimes, and then started a three-year term of supervised release. While on supervised release, Defendant admitted to Colorado authorities that he had left sexually explicit voicemail messages with a woman he did not know, in violation of state law. He received an additional ten months of imprisonment to be followed by twenty-six months of supervised release, including a condition that he participate in a sex offender treatment program. Upon review, the Tenth Circuit surmised that Defendant's experience of vindictiveness was "more akin to failed plea negotiation" and not clear evidence the government was motivated by vindictiveness against him. Furthermore, the Court found that Defendant's objections were not yet ripe as he was incarcerated as he made them, and the objections pertained to the "treatment contract" that was not yet final until he finished serving his time.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.