Zaring v. Wiley, No. 11-1036 (10th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this CaseIn 2003, Petitioner Jeffrey Zaring was arrested in Utah three times on drug charges. In 2004, the US Attorney's office filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus ad presequendum to arraign Petitioner on federal drug charges. Through the writ issues, Petitioner remained physically housed in a county jail. In order to try Petitioner on the state charges, Utah issued its own writ of habeas corpus ad presequendum later that year. Petitioner was sentenced in state court to a term of one to fifteen years, with the sentence to run concurrently with any sentence imposed for the pending federal charges. In 2005, Petitioner pled guilty to federal drug charges and was sentenced to 121 months' imprisonment to run concurrently with his state sentence. Petitioner was returned to state custody, and finished his state sentence. He received credit against his state sentence for the time he spent in a local county jail. Once his state sentence was complete, Petitioner was transferred to federal custody. After transfer, and after exhausting his administrative remedies, Petitioner unsuccessfully petitioned the district court seeking credit against his federal sentence for his pre-trial detention. Upon consideration of Petitioner's sentences, the Tenth Circuit found that Petitioner was not entitled to apply the pre-detention credit twice. The Court affirmed the district court's decision.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.