United States v. Mouille, No. 10-4175 (10th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this CaseIn July, 2010, Anthony Mouille plead guilty to counts of identity fraud and theft that stemmed from his possession of stolen and counterfeit checks he intended to use to commit bank fraud. The district court imposed an eighteen month sentence on one count, and a statutorily-mandated consecutive sentence of twenty-four months on the other. Defendant appealed his sentence, arguing that they were both procedurally and substantively unreasonable. Specifically, Defendant argued that the district court failed to expressly acknowledge that it understood the U.S. Sentencing guidelines are not mandatory. The Tenth Circuit found that the district court did not articulate on the record that the Sentencing guidelines are not mandatory, but Defendant made no showing that that was error. The Court affirmed the lower court’s decision.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.