Ficken, et al v. Internal Revenue Service, No. 10-1276 (10th Cir. 2011)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit August 23, 2011 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT In re: KENT EDWIN FICKEN; ROBERTA PAULINE FICKEN, No. 10-1276 Debtors. ___________________________ KENT EDWIN FICKEN; ROBERTA PAULINE FICKEN, (BAP No. 09-042-CO) Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant - Appellant. ORDER Before HARTZ, ANDERSON, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges. This matter is before the court to correct a clerical error in the Order and Judgment issued August 22, 2011. The corrected Order and Judgment is filed nunc pro tunc to the original filing date, and is attached to this order. Entered for the Court Elisabeth A. Shumaker, Clerk FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit August 22, 2011 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT In re: KENT EDWIN FICKEN; ROBERTA PAULINE FICKEN, No. 10-1276 Debtors. ___________________________ KENT EDWIN FICKEN; ROBERTA PAULINE FICKEN, (BAP No. 09-042-CO) Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant - Appellant. ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before HARTZ, ANDERSON, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges. The dispositive legal issue in this appeal has been resolved by this court s opinion in United States v. Dawes, No. 09-3129, 2011 WL 2450930 (10th Cir. * After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. June 21, 2011). We REVERSE the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel with directions to REMAND this matter to the bankruptcy court for further proceedings consistent with that opinion. ENTERED FOR THE COURT Harris L Hartz Circuit Judge -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.