United States v. Rice, No. 07-5149 (10th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit December 12, 2008 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 07-5149 (D.C. No. 06-CR-063-001-TCK) (N.D. Okla.) v. KEVIN LEROY RICE, Defendant-Appellant. ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before BRISCOE, BRORBY, and EBEL, Circuit Judges. On appeal, Defendant-Appellant Kevin Leroy Rice contended that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). While the appeal was pending and after oral argument, however, the warden of the prison where Mr. Rice was incarcerated informed this court that Mr. Rice has died. [D]eath pending direct review of a criminal conviction abates not only the appeal but also all proceedings * This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. had in the prosecution from its inception. United States v. Davis, 953 F.2d 1482, 1486 (10th Cir. 1992) (quoting Durham v. United States, 401 U.S. 481, 483 (1971) (per curiam) (footnote omitted) overruled on other grounds, Dove v. United States, 423 U.S. 325 (1976) (per curiam)); see also United States v. Sloan, 26 Fed. Appx. 890 (10th Cir. Feb. 6, 2002) (unpublished) (remanding case, with directions to vacate the judgment and dismiss the underlying indictment, where appellant died pending the direct appeal of his sentence). Accordingly, this case is REMANDED to the district court with directions to VACATE the judgment of conviction and DISMISS the underlying indictment. 1 ENTERED FOR THE COURT David M. Ebel Circuit Judge 1 If counsel for the Appellant wishes to challenge the factual premise that Appellant has died, counsel shall do so by filing a request for reconsideration of this order within ten days from the date of the filing of this Order. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.