United States vs. Gore, No. 06-3077 (10th Cir. 2006)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES CO URT O F APPEALS September 25, 2006 TENTH CIRCUIT Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court U N ITED STA TES O F A M ER ICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 06-3077 District of Kansas GEO RG E CURTIS GORE, (D.C. No. 01-CR-10020-W EB) Defendant-Appellant. OR D ER AND JUDGM ENT * Before M U RPH Y, SE YM OU R, and M cCO NNELL, Circuit Judges. George Curtis Gore appeals from the district court s order revoking his supervised release and imposing a 10-month term of imprisonment. At the district court hearing, M r. Gore admitted to violating the terms of his supervised release by failing on several occasions to participate in a drug treatment program * After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). This case is therefore submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. and by failing to abstain from alcohol on one occasion. He has not retracted that admission or introduced any new evidence. In accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), M r. Gore s counsel has filed a M otion to W ithdraw as Counsel and a brief stating that there are no grounds for appeal. In counsel s brief, he states that M r. Gore does not meet any of the criteria for review under 18 U.S.C. § 3742. M r. Gore has not filed a brief indicating disagreement with his counsel s position. Our independent review of the record reveals no grounds for relief under § 3742. Therefore, attorney Jon S. W omack s motion to withdraw as counsel for Appellant is GR ANTED, and the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of K ansas is AFFIRM ED. Entered for the Court, M ichael W . M cConnell Circuit Judge -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
