Bassett vs. Wiley, No. 06-1514 (10th Cir. 2007)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES CO URT O F APPEALS March 15, 2007 TENTH CIRCUIT Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court RO NA LD K . BA SSETT, Petitioner-Appellee, v. No. 06-1514 District of Colorado (D.C. No. 06-CV-374-W YD) R. W ILEY, W arden, Respondent-Appellant. OR D ER AND JUDGM ENT * Before M U RPH Y, M cW ILLIAM S, and HA RTZ, Circuit Judges. The abatement entered in this matter originally on January 29, 2007, is lifted. In accord with the response the government submitted to our order dated February 21, 2007, and more particularly in light of our opinion in Wedelstedt v. Wiley, __F.3d__, No. 06-1461, 2007 W L 512517 (10th Cir. Feb. 20, 2007), the * After examining the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). This case is therefore submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. judgm ent of the district court in this matter is AFFIRMED. Entered for the Court, Per Curiam -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
