Prairie Band vs. Richards, No. 03-3218 (10th Cir. 2006)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PU BL ISH November 7, 2006 UNITED STATES CO URT O F APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT PRAIRIE BAND POTAW ATOM I N A TIO N , Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 03-3218 JOAN W AGNON, Secretary of the Kansas Department of Revenue, D.C. No. 99-CV-4071-JAR (D. Kansas) (241 F. Supp. 2d 1295 (Kan. 2003)) Defendant-Appellee, _______________________________ W IN N EBAG O TR IB E O F N EBRA SK A , H CI D ISTR IB UTION, TH E K IC KA PO O TR IB E O F IN D IA N S O F TH E K IC KA PO O R ESER VA TIO N IN K A N SA S, THE IO W A TR IB E O F K A N SA S A ND N EBRA SK A , A N D TH E SA C AND FOX NATION OF M ISSOURI, Amici Curiae. O PIN IO N O N R EM A ND FR OM TH E U N IT ED STATES SUPREM E COURT David Prager, III, Tribal Attorney, Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation, M ayetta, Kansas, for Plaintiff-Appellant. John M ichael Hale, Special Assistant Attorney General, Kansas Department of Revenue, Topeka, Kansas, for Defendant-Appellee. Before LUC ER O, M cKA Y, and HA RTZ, Circuit Judges. M cK A Y, Circuit Judge. In view of the Supreme Court s decision in Wagnon v. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation, 546 U.S. ___, 126 S. Ct. 676 (2005), and after supplemental hearing, the prior decision of this court is vacated, as is the portion of the district court s opinion that applies the interest-balancing test. The order of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant is AFFIRM ED. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
