Garry L. Snyder and Rita L. Snyder, Sui Juris, a "state" Infact, a People for the Kansas State, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. District Court of Stafford County, State of Kansas, Apolitical Subdivision of the United States, I.e., Themunicipal Corporation of the District of Columbia, and Allagents, Jeff L. Mcvey, Hannelore Kitts, Timarie Walters,kyann Buck, Jeff Parr, and Carla J. Stovall, Individuals,defendants-appellees, 98 F.3d 1350 (10th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseBefore TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.**
Plaintiffs Garry L. Snyder and Rita L. Snyder appeal from the district court's order dismissing their complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We have read the parties' briefs and pleadings, and reviewed the entire record before us. We affirm substantially for the reasons ably set forth in the district court's order dismissing the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.1
AFFIRMED.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case therefore is ordered submitted without oral argument
Defendant Jeff L. McVey's motion to dismiss the appeal is denied as moot
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
